Overcoming challenges in AI and healthcare
Various Artificial Intelligence issues still need to be resolved. For example, AI arouses suspicion whenever it provides information without sufficient explanation or makes ‘mistakes’. “So it’s important to have a system essentially explain why it is choosing something and then allow you to potentially change the sensitivity and specificity,” maintained Professor Siegel. “And when it makes mistakes, we need procedures to follow up on how to improve the AI,” added Professor van Ginneken,
Bias is another issue the industry is grappling with. “Algorithms that are trained for one specific purpose are often trained on one specific cohort,” noted Mediator, Rich Mather. “And what’s developed on one population doesn't always perform as well on other populations. So it's important to share what population the algorithm was initially trained on,” said Professor Siegel,
Despite current shortcomings, AI offers vast potential for resolving healthcare’s growing workload crisis. Many medical professionals feel they are working on an ‘assembly line’ these days. In particular, it’s no longer practical for radiologists to handle all CT lung cancer screening. “You should delegate a small percentage of the cases to a board of experts to review, but the bulk should be done automatically in screening applications,” Professor van Ginneken asserted. Hopefully, AI solutions will simplify the workflow and vastly increase productivity.
AI also offers great opportunities for reducing disparities in healthcare. “In Africa, they never built a landline phone infrastructure and directly went to mobile phones,”
Professor van Ginneken recalled. “I think they will embrace AI tools, and hopefully refer cases digitally to specialists, to make healthcare more efficient.”
“AI will democratize expertise throughout the world. We should see a significant decrease in disparity with regard to expertise, ” Professor Siegel agreed.
As we start seeing AI applications on app store platforms claiming to interpret chest radiographs for TB or read MRIs of the knee, there will need to be some mechanism for grading performance. Various organizations are trying to establish such initiatives.
“However, the gold standard can be really challenging to set,” said Professor Siegel. “Do you want an application that’s very sensitive and doesn't miss a case, or one that’s very specific and doesn't want to overcall it?”
Professor van Ginneken agreed. “What do we want? I think that’s usually the most important question when you have new technology,” he said. //